Commentary for Bava Kamma 211:17

טוען טענת גנב ובאו עדים נמי לא אמר רב דהא כתיב תשלומי כפל כי קאמר כגון שטוען טענת אבד ונשבע ולא הודה ובאו עדים

As he<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., R. Hamnuna. ');">³⁰</span> raised this difficulty so he also solved it, by pointing out that the text should be interpreted disjunctively: 'Where an oath was imposed upon him [by the Court, but taken] outside the Court of law,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [In which case it still remains a private matter and does not bar the judicial re-opening of the case.] ');">³¹</span>

Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 211:17. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.